Oct 13, 2025 (MarketLine via COMTEX) --
Greenpeace accused the government of aEURoeclimate denialaEUR, while Federated Farmers of New Zealand said the cuts are aEURoelong overdueaEUR.
New Zealand has cut its methane emissions targets from agriculture, a move criticised by Greenpeace but welcomed by the local farming group body.
The government of Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced the reduction in biogenic methane emissions aEUR" those generated by meat and dairy livestock aEUR" targets yesterday (12 October), setting a new goal by 2050 to achieve cuts of 14-24% from 2017 levels.
It previously sought to lower biogenic methane emissions by 24-47% over the same timeframe. However, a goal to reduce those emissions by 10% by 2030 was left in place using the same 2017 yardstick.
Meanwhile, New Zealand is not moving away from a target to reach net zero in terms of greenhouse gas emissions such as carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrous oxide, excluding biogenic methane, by 2050.
Campaign group Greenpeace said the new target aEURoeamounts to full-blown climate denialaEUR.
Changing Markets Foundation, the NGO environmental advocacy group, suggests methane is a aEURoesignificantaEUR contributor to global warming (0.5AC based on 2023 data from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), compared to 0.8AC for CO2.
Amanda Larsson, a climate campaigner at Greenpeace Aotearoa, said in yesterdayaEUR(TM)s statement that New ZealandaEUR(TM)s decision is aEURoetruly astoundingaEUR.
She added: aEURoeLuxon has gone full-on Trump. HeaEUR(TM)s choosing climate denial and corporate profits over our kidsaEUR(TM) future.
aEURoeNew Zealand is the worldaEUR(TM)s biggest dairy exporter. If we back down on cutting emissions from our most polluting industry, you can bet other big livestock-producing countries will jump on the bandwagon. That could be game over for the climate.aEUR
Wayne Langford, the president of Federated Farmers of New Zealand, said the backtrack by the government was aEURoelong overdueaEUR and represents a aEURoepractical stepaEUR in the support of farmers.
He said the previous methane emissions target of 24-47% aEURoelacked any credible science to underpin itaEUR and put New Zealand farmers at risk of going out of business.
aEURoeKiwi farmers have been bogged down in completely unscientific, unaffordable and unrealistic climate policy for far too long. At times itaEUR(TM)s felt like absolute madness that weaEUR(TM)d even be talking about policies that would shut down farms, send production offshore, and completely undermine New ZealandaEUR(TM)s economy," he suggested.
Langford claimed New ZealandaEUR(TM)s meat and dairy farmers are the aEURoemost climate-friendlyaEUR in the world.
He added: aEURoeThis new target brings New ZealandaEUR(TM)s climate policy in line with what the research tells us is actually required to stop Kiwi farmers contributing to further warming.
aEURoeA methane tax would have achieved the opposite of its intent - forcing the closure of Kiwi farms, driving production to less efficient countries, and increasing global emissions.aEUR
Under New ZealandaEUR(TM)s Climate Change Response Act, the government is obliged to review the 2050 targets every five years to aEURoeensure they are fit for purposeaEUR, the administration confirmed in yesterdayaEUR(TM)s statement.
A so-called aEURoesplit-gasaEUR approach has been taken to separate biogenic methane emissions from CO2 emissions. That is because methane emissions are considered a aEURoeshort-lived greenhouse gasaEUR as opposed to long-lived with CO2, the government said.
The 2050 biogenic methane target will be next reviewed in 2040. Based on current projections, the government said it is confident it can achieve the 2050 goals of net zero greenhouse gases and the 24% cut in methane emissions.
However, it added that aEURoesince 2050 is so far in the future, thereaEUR(TM)s a high degree of uncertainty around these projectionsaEUR.
http://www.datamonitor.com
Republication or redistribution, including by framing or similar means,
is expressly prohibited without prior written consent. Datamonitor shall
not be liable for errors or delays in the content, or for any actions
taken in reliance thereon
COMTEX_469495127/2227/2025-10-13T09:32:48
Copyright (C) 2025 Datamonitor. All rights reserved
