Jan 27, 2026 (MarketLine via COMTEX) --
The UK government has reviewed a model, launched 20 years ago, that underpins which food and drinks are classed as high in saturated fat, sugar or salt.
The UK government has published plans to change the countryaEUR(TM)s nutrient profiling model, which classifies the health credentials of food and drinks sold in the country.
The nutrient profiling model (NPM), launched more than 20 years ago, underpins which food and drinks are classed as high in saturated fat, sugar or salt, or HFSS.
Ofcom, the UKaEUR(TM)s broadcast regulator, uses the NPM to enforce rules that curb the advertising of HFSS products.
Changes to the countryaEUR(TM)s dietary recommendations since the NPM was launched mean it is outdated, the UK government said today (27 January).
The revisions to the NPM include a change in a model based on total sugars to aEUR~freeaEUR(TM) sugars, which are defined as all added sugars in any form, including honey, all sugars naturally present in fruit and veg, as well as all sugars in drinks. Overall, the changes could see thousands more products categorised as HFSS.
In documents published online today, the UKaEUR(TM)s Department of Health & Social Care (DHSC) said the changes are based on proposals put forward in 2018 by the then Public Health England agency. Those plans were shelved after pushback from industry.
The DHSC is to consult on how the changes will apply to the new rules on advertising and supermarket promotions that came into effect in the UK at the start of the year.
UK industry body The Food and Drink Federation (FDF) expressed its unease about the potential impact of the changes.
aEURoeFood and drink manufacturers have made multi-million-pound investments to meet the nutrient profile model that underpins the new promotion and advertising restrictions, the latest of which only came into force in this month. This includes developing new options that make it easier for consumers to swap to healthier choices,aEUR Karen Betts, the FDFaEUR(TM)s chief executive, said.
aEURoeWe have serious concerns that changing to the new model will mean many healthier options could no longer be promoted or advertised to consumers, which runs the risk of them being delisted by retailers. We urge government to meet industry as soon as possible to discuss our concerns and how we can work together to help shift consumers towards healthier diets.aEUR
Campaign groups and academics, however, have welcomed the update to the NPM.
Sonia Pombo, head of research and impact at Action on Salt & Sugar, said: aEURoeWe welcome the governmentaEUR(TM)s long-awaited update to the nutrient profile model, which represents a clear improvement on the outdated 2004 model and better reflects current evidence on free sugars. No model is perfect, but this update is a necessary step forward and provides a stronger, more evidence-based foundation for food policy aEUR" and one that should come as no surprise to industry, having first been consulted on in 2018.aEUR
Dr Kath Roberts, a senior lecturer in public health nutrition, at the University of York, added: aEURoeThe updated nutrient profiling model reflects where the science is now, not where it was fifteen years ago. It provides a far more accurate way of identifying foods that undermine health, particularly for children and, if it is applied to policy in the future, will ensure that advertising and promotions are based on evidence rather than outdated thresholds. Delaying its implementation would mean knowingly maintaining a food environment that drives poor diet and widening health inequalities.aEUR
http://www.datamonitor.com
Republication or redistribution, including by framing or similar means,
is expressly prohibited without prior written consent. Datamonitor shall
not be liable for errors or delays in the content, or for any actions
taken in reliance thereon
COMTEX_472469578/2227/2026-01-27T09:58:16
Copyright (C) 2026 Datamonitor. All rights reserved
